It is to playwright Rajiv Joseph’s credit that his absurdist war drama packs a punch. Set just after the Gulf War, with Saddam Hussein and his sons dead, the piece focuses on the aftermath of bombing and is filled with ghosts. There is plenty that is powerful but, regrettably, not quite enough that is credible. While the mayhem and the murder around the conflict is clear, not enough time is spent on anyone’s motivation for the piece to convince.
Ammar Haj Ahmad plays a gardener turned translator for the army, troubled by the ghosts of his sister and Uday Hussein, who he used to work for. Patrick Gibson plays a soldier who comes to be haunted by his comrade, played by Arinzé Kene, after the latter has a nervous breakdown because he, in turn, is haunted by the tiger of the title. Director Omar Elerian manages to make the story clear, which is no small achievement, and the supernatural elements are staged well. But there are too many actions and responses from characters that don’t quite make sense.
The stories are interesting and the elements of horror intriguing. Lots of people lose a hand. There’s no need to go into details. It is fair to say that the play deals with extremes but, at times, the cast struggle with this intensity. In their respective roles, Haj Ahmad can show little more than anguish and Gibson only has anger to offer. Kene has a happier time of it as his character changes after death to become a polyglot intellectual – the alteration is handled with confidence but, again, it leaves too many questions.
The most notable spectre is the tiger himself, the most interesting character by far, and the play lags too much when he isn’t around. In the afterlife, the tiger becomes philosophical and brings a lot of discussion about nature and religion to life. Peter Forbes is fantastic in the role, his achievement all the more impressive given that he took on the part at the last moment (due to the indisposition of David Threlfall and after Kathryn Hunter filled in on press night).
Forbes gets laughs too but, overall, there are problems with the play’s humour. Not that it is too dark, which is to be expected, but that it is repetitious. Sayyid Aki has a good go at Uday, his caricature bringing a welcome break in the pace. But too much time is taken up with crudity and poor jokes about language differences. The problem is in keeping with a script that is too laboured, even if Elerian does a great job of injecting speed.
It isn’t that the metaphors here are bad, more that they are overused. I guess it’s easy to counter that there is nothing subtle about war. But Joseph struggles to tell us anything new. That war is bad and trauma has an impact are important lessons, but ones few can say they haven’t heard before. The frustration is that nobody seems to listen. I think the tiger would agree – but Joseph doesn’t explore this.
Until 31 January 2026
Photo by Helen Murray
