Tag Archives: Richard Howell

“Entertaining Mr Sloane” at the Young Vic

Revivals of Joe Orton’s plays arrive with concerns. The playwright’s reputation for outrageousness brings baggage. It’s to the credit of director Nadia Fall that this 1963 play is still shocking. It’s a shame that it isn’t as funny as it might be.

Fall tries hard to revel in the extreme and experimental aspects of the text, but the effort is limited because a lot of the humour is neglected. The dialogue isn’t odd just because of its time of writing – the mannered expression and convulsions reflect hypocrisy and twisted desires. Designer Peter McKintosh mirrors this with bric-a-brac, all painted black, suspended above the action like a Cornelia Parker installation. Meanwhile, lighting from Richard Howell includes bold colours and strobes to anachronistically split up scenes. It’s all a risk, as arty touches might alienate some from the play. And Entertaining Mr Sloane – with murder, misogyny and abuse at its core – is fairly hard to get your head around anyway.

Tamzin-Outhwaite-in-Entertaining-Mr-Sloane-at-Young-Vic-credit-Ellie-Kurttz
Tamzin Outhwaite

It isn’t an easy play for the cast either. Orton’s characters are forcefully flat. Motives are transparent, not just for comedy, but to show the audience that everyone here is delusional. But the performances are good. The least successfully written is a father figure, Kemp, capably played by Christopher Fairbank, who manages to inject a good deal of fear into the piece. But the role is too clearly a foil for the other power plays going on. Here, Daniel Cerqueira’s deadpan delivery as Ed gets a little monotonous, though the character is suitably chilling and repressed. Tamsin Outhwaite is a revelation as the sexually frustrated Kath, a woman you might feel sorry for, who Outhwaite makes truly grotesque thereby coming closest to Orton’s humour. As the object of both their affection, the titular lead, Jordan Stephens, has no problem with the charisma his character is said to possess. But Sloane is poorly served by Fall – he is never allowed to be quite threatening or funny enough. There’s a lack of subtlety to moments where the character thinks he has the upper hand because, here, Sloane is never in charge.

There’s a lot of lying. Deceit is often clear, even brazen, as characters are lying to themselves as much as each other. Is this the play’s attraction in 2025? Orton’s world as post-truth! And note, these lies excuse murder and assaults driven by lust and power. We’re a long way from a sex comedy and Fall’s move towards the serious sacrifices a lot. By the end, Sloane is literally tied up by Ed and Kath, as he is to be ‘shared’, so it isn’t subtle. Perhaps the focus is youth and how power held by an older generation is used to exploit? It adds to a creepy feel and gives this already robust play a shot in the arm.

Until 8 November 2025

www.youngvic.org

Photo by Ellie Kurttz

“Guards At The Taj” at the Bush Theatre

Reopening after a year of refurbishment and looking very smart indeed, artistic director Madani Younis’ reinvigorated west London venue is off to a brilliant new start. An award-winning play from American writer Rajiv Joseph combines with two big UK names: director Jamie Lloyd and designer Soutra Gilmour.

Joseph’s play is a marvel of economy – 80 minutes packed with ideas, emotion, comedy and tragedy. Two guards on the Taj Mahal construction site are forbidden from seeing the mausoleum before its completion, by decree from Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan. The tension between despotic whims and these average guys escalates into horrific acts that are the stuff of myths (the play has its share of gore) and raise profound questions about aesthetics and the individual in society. Yet Joseph deals with his themes lightly – no matter how dark and dangerous the drama gets.

Lloyd embraces the play’s contemporary feel, following instruction in the script that dialects are not to be used and highlighting every possible moment of relief in shocking circumstances. The performers – Danny Ashok and Darren Kuppan – both deserve the highest praise. Kuppan makes it impossible not to love his character Babur’s “fancies and prophecies and inventions”. The more pragmatic Humayun more slowly grows on us (through our appreciation of his family life) a feat Ashok manoeuvres to give full force to both men’s tragedy.

Gilmour’s industrial aesthetic, recalling for me the work of Richard Serra or Richard Wilson’s 20:50 installation, looks fantastic. Working alongside lighting designer Richard Howell, this set is a real stunner. And Beauty, with a capital B, is important here. There are moments of wonder at architecture, also nature. And a beautiful friendship: touching scenes between the two men do more than lead to the final trauma. Babur and Hamayan’s dream of a different life produces that ingredient of hope that provides a “wow” to the play as a whole.

Until 20 May 2017

www.bushtheatre.co.uk

Photo by Marc Brenner