Tag Archives: Grant Olding

“Romeo and Juliet” at Shakespeare’s Globe

Director Sean Holmes gives his version of Shakespeare’s tragedy a Wild West setting. And why not? The play has been put into so many different times and locations it’s hard to keep track. Most importantly, though, this is a sold production that leans into the venue’s strengths and unique atmosphere so that it is sure to please.

What does this nineteenth-century American location add? Well, let’s say it doesn’t take anything away. And it might convince more if the accents employed were consistent. But a culture of violence and rough justice map onto the plot well. It’s the close study of the script that’s the important thing.

The concept is embraced by the leads – Rawaed Asde and Lola Shalam – who are both strong. There is an appropriate emphasises on their youth. Asde is a puppyish figure full of energy and Juliet feisty but also confused. Both are a little, well, silly; it’s a fair interpretation, some of what these loved up teens say, even if great poetry, is hyperbolic. The performances are enjoyable throughout and it’s a nice touch that, in this production, the couple get the last lines.

The rest of the cast is, unfortunately, just a little uneven. Older characters are too easily lost, especially the Prince (cast as some kind of Sheriff). Some voices are lacking range and a couple of performers sound hoarse. This is a tough performance space physically; poor Benvolio (Roman Asde) seems to have a plane overhead every time he opens his mouth. Thankfully, Jamie-Rose Monk’s nurse is super and Michael Elcock’s crowd-pleasing Mercutio one of the best I’ve seen. Importantly, the whole cast work well with the audience – a key to success at the Globe.

Michael-Elcock-as-Mercutio-in-Romeo-and-Juliet-at-Shakespeare's-Globe-credit-Tristram-Kenton
Michael Elcock

Another highlight comes from Grant Olding’s work as composer. The mix of Americana adds to the atmosphere but never feels forced. Treating Shakespeare as your lyricist is surely intimidating but Olding makes light work of it. There’s a lot of singing and dancing all adding to a jolly feel. At least until just before the interval. The question arises – how does the humour fit with the tragedy?

It’s clear the tone of the piece needs to develop. And if there are still too many laughs for my liking, Holmes has the intriguing idea of introducing dreamlike elements. Aided again by Olding’s soundscape, a messenger to Romeo and the apothecary appear like somnambulists. In the tomb Juliet is joined by Mercutio, Tybalt and Paris (a good stage debut for Joe Reynolds) who move around in a trance and even line dance. It’s pretty creepy.

It’s a shame Friar Lawrence isn’t developed to play a part in these supernatural suggestions. But like the many dreams recounted, all the fear, blood and guts, and elaborate death throws make the violence nightmarish. The conceit might have problems, but it makes the play fresh and surprising. Introducing the unexpected into Romeo and Juliet is a big achievement.

Until 2 August 2025

www.shakespearesglobe.com

Photos by Tristram Kenton

“Richard II” at the Bridge Theatre

After the tremendous, nearly two year long run of Guys and Dolls, Nicholas Hytner’s Tower Bridge venue has another hit on its hands. OK, it’s more star casting, with Jonathan Bailey taking the lead as Shakespeare’s deposed monarch. But there’s a lot more to this production; Hytner is too experienced a director to be swayed by a star and this is solid work through and through. 

Breathe easy, Bailey is very good. Richard’s complexity is tackled well; Bailey can do frantic and philosophical and he “sports” – his Richard is a wit and gets laughs. The performance is smart enough to use Bailey’s reputation as a heartthrob to lean into Richard’s vanity and suggest a parallel between the divine right of Kings and celebrity. If it is a depiction to respect rather than inspire, it is impossible not to admire it.

Bailey is also a generous performer; like Hytner, fully aware the text isn’t just about Richard. Every role is given its due with a tremendous attention to detail so that the whole ensemble shine. You might easily end up awarding the laurels to Royce Pierreson who plays the usurping Bullingbrook, brilliantly reflecting how the man’s ambition conflicts with a grudging respect for Richard. The future Henry IV is a schemer, of course, but the sense of events out of his control, and Pierreson reacting to them, is wonderfully dynamic.

Richard-II-Vinnie-Heaven-credit-Manuel-Harlan
Vinnie Heaven

There are further fine performances, from relatively small roles that are easy to ignore in most productions: Badria Timimi does well as the Bishop of Carlisle, providing an important religious context to the argument. Michael Simkins, Amanda Root and Vinnie Heaven are all superb as the family York torn apart by the conflict they find themselves in. Hytner and his cast convey how fraught capturing the crown is for these people, how tense this time in British history was, and the drama gains in tension as a result.

Richard-II-Amanda-Root-and-Michael-Simkins-credit-Manuel-Harlan
Amanda Root and Michael Simkins

Hytner uses Bob Crowley’s set marvellously, with minimal props appearing from the floor to effectively create scenes. It all looks stylish and, despite a long running time, the action is swift. If there’s a flaw, Grant Olding’s score for the show is cumbersome, imposing on events rather than complimenting them. But it’s hard to find fault in work that’s accomplished all around – a team, and a star, at the top of their game.

Until 10 May 2025

www.bridgetheatre.co.uk

Photos by Manuel Harlan

“Oppenheimer” at the Vaudeville Theatre

The RSC’s transfer of Tom Morton-Smith’s new play immerses us in the history of the first atomic bomb and the mind of its maker, J Robert Oppenheimer. It’s a story with overwhelming potential – a rich mix of documentary and speculation – and the play is fascinating, if over ambitious. Angus Jackson’s direction deserves credit for inventive staging that aids dryer moments, using Robert Innes Hopkins design, and an impressive injection of music from Grant Olding.

Overall, strong performances balance some over enthusiastic accents – émigré scientists drafted onto the project to build the bomb prove too much of a temptation – so acting that benefits the script sits alongside some delivery that’s tricky to comprehend. The women in the piece stand out, both Hedydd Dylan and Catherine Steadman, as Oppenheimer’s love interests, do well with roles that come perilously close to tokenistic.

There are passages of writing that make it clear how talented Morton-Smith is. But he seems in thrall to history and detail, so the play ends up too long. Are this many characters really needed to explain the allegation that Oppenheimer turned his back on friends and ideals to win fame? And difficult though the science is, I’ve seen better attempts at explaining complex theories on stage. The biggest problem is knowing where to end the story: the bombs’ impact on all our lives might be a whole other play – tacking it on to this one doesn’t do the phenomena justice.

Nor does Morton-Smith make it easy for his leading character. Oppenheimer is a man of iron, cold and remote, yet forced to reveal enough trauma for any lifetime. His affairs, childhood, politics and philosophy are all tackled and none of it is simple. All the more credit, then, to John Heffernan in the title role. Seldom have I seen a show rest so heavily on its leading man. Heffernan’s performance confirms his status as one of the finest actors around – conveying the complexity of the physicist, making all that history and politics seem manageable and even convincing us of his character’s particular charisma. A stunning performance that gives this show enough bang to counter the occasional whimper.

Until 23 May 2015

www.rsc.org.uk

Photo by Keith Pattison